Coastal Ocean Analytics

Living Shorelines in Connecticut

Why Living Shorelines
The Connecticut Coast
Types of Living Shorelines
Non-structural
Hybrid
Design Considerations
Permitting
Resources
Printer Friendly Version

Non-Structural Living Shorelines

Shoreline stabilization approaches using only vegetation or fill material are most effective at sheltered sites without critical infrastructure.

Vegetation Management

The most minimally disruptive approach to living shoreline protection is vegetation management. Removal of overhanging tree branches reduces shade and thereby increases marsh grass growth (VIMS-CCRM, 2006). Removal of unstable trees reduces the risk of slope destabilization that can occur when upland or slope trees are uprooted.

Slope or Bank Grading

Grading of steep, eroding banks can produce a more stable slope; however, if the bank or bluff is currently vegetated, slope planting is a more appropriate response (Maryland Department of Environment, 2008). Re-graded banks are frequently stabilized by salt tolerant plantings.

slope vegetating before
slope vegetation after
(photo credit: New England Environmental)

Upland plantings stabilize bluffs and reduce rainwater runoff. Eroding banks can also be protected from erosion by the creation of a salt marsh. Through bank re-grading or application of fill material, the intertidal zone can be planted with appropriate, salt-tolerant vegetation, thus creating a fringe tidal marsh (Chesapeake Bay Foundation, 2007; Hardaway et al., 2009; VIMS-CCRM, 2006). Steep banks can sometimes be stabilized with “living walls” which are engineered support structures planted with vegetation to reduce erosion. Living wall structures reduce the need for extensive bank re-grading (Duhring, 2008a).Although toe protection can be combined with slope grading, terracing and slope grading are generally not effective shoreline protection for sites exposed to significant wave-induced erosion.

Marsh Restoration or Creation

The creation or restoration of fringing marshes is the most widely used non-structural approach to erosion control. Although it is possible to create a marsh on most shorelines, marsh creation is not recommended for sites where they are not a natural feature along comparable natural shorelines (MD DOE, 2008). For narrow or eroding marshes, tidal marsh maintenance and enhancement is appropriate. Sparse marsh can be enhanced with plugs of marsh grass (Broome, Rogers, and Seneca, 1992). If necessary, fill material can be deposited to provide a suitably gradual slope for marsh creation or to enable a marsh to maintain its elevation with respect to the water level (VIMS-CCRM, 2006). While shoreline stabilization using only plants may be a viable solution on protected sites, along more exposed shorelines, fringe marsh plantings will likely require temporary or permanent supplemental structures, such as toe protection or sills, to ensure planting establishment. Plugs or live stakes are planted landward of MLW with the expectation that they will fill in within one to two growing seasons, providing the wave attenuation and habitat services of natural marsh vegetation. The success of the restored fringe marsh depends on width of the existing shoreline, the depth and composition of the existing soil, the slope of the shoreline, the shoreline configuration, exposure and orientation, and sun/shade conditions (MD DOE, 2008).

Beach Nourishment

Natural beaches are in a constant state of flux, responding to changes in wave energy and sea level (Lithgow et al., 2013). Post-storm beaches can become too narrow and steep for recreational opportunities or coastal protection. Storms can create steep scarps which could be dangerous for beach goers. With sufficient time, appropriate wave climate and sufficient supply of sand, beaches may restore themselves but few coastal communities can risk the loss of recreational services or erosion control while waiting for natural restoration to occur. Beach nourishment (also referred to as fill or replenishment) “restores” the beach quickly by importing sand from a land or offshore site. While nourishment may recover some of the ecosystem services that are typically lost on a developed and armored beach, nourishment does not “restore” a beach. Beaches nourished for optimum recreation or scenic views are graded too flat and low to provide storm protection. Nourishment can also bury native vegetation which can provide an opportunity for invasive species to colonize.  Nourished sediment may also adversely affect nesting and foraging of shorebirds and other coastal animals (Nordstrom, Lampe, and Vandemark, 2000).

It is not unusual for large volumes of fill material to be transported away from the nourished site within the first winter or after the first storm (Dias et al., 2003). Although frequently identified as a “failure” by property owners, this is typically the result of the beach transforming into a more natural profile and had been accounted for during the design process (Committee on Beach Nourishment and Protection, National Research Council, 1995). Therefore, periodic maintenance of nourished beaches should be expected and included in the life-cycle costs of the project.

Dune Creation and Restoration

Dune creation or restoration may be a component of a beach nourishment effort or a stand-alone project. Although it is more effective to maintain existing dunes, coastal development and storm damage can render intervention necessary. The same process is used to create a dune as is found in nature, but at a faster pace. Dune restoration will be most successful if: it is located where the natural dune line should be and if possible, tied into existing dunes; there is sufficient space for the dune to form and move naturally; manmade damage is mitigated or prevented and; nature is assisted not destroyed (Salmon, Henningsen, and McAlpin, 1982).

Dune Grass

Even on very small sites with less than ideal conditions, beach grass can be used to create protective dunes. This dune was created by planting beach grass on a 6 m wide property located above a 1 m high seawall, topped by a paved sidewalk. The dune is now over 1 m high and the beach grass is colonizing neighboring properties.

Dune restoration signThree approaches are used to create or restore dunes: vegetate, provide additional sediment, or remove manmade structures that constrain dune development (Lithgow et al., 2013; Martinez, Hesp, and Gallego-Fernandez, 2013). Sand fences, planted vegetation, fertilization and water are all used to increase natural dune processes (Salmon, Henningsen, and McAlpin, 1982). In areas where dunes do not form naturally, manmade dunes will not be successful. Dunes that can not be maintained after wave or storm damage will also be successful. In locations where dunes can form, dune creation and restoration should be similar to local naturally formed dunes. For instance, in low wave energy conditions dunes will have lower elevations than dunes in high wave energy conditions. Along the Connecticut shoreline of Long Island Sound coast, the lack of naturally available sediment available for transport and dune growth will limit the ability of dunes to restore naturally from storm damage.

Christmas trees

If there is insufficient sediment available for dunes to form naturally, clean sediment of similar composition to that which would occur naturally must be brought to the site to create the dunes. After the dune is formed, fencing and vegetation can be used as barriers to the wind, causing windborne sediment to accumulate around the fence or plantings (O’Connell, 2008). Almost any type of fencing, snow fencing, plastic or fabric fencing, or coniferous (e.g., “Christmas trees”) or other brush, can be used to create dunes provided it does not completely block the wind.


 

 

Back to top

Coastal Ocean Analytics Logo
Jennifer O'Donnell, Ph.D.
Coastal Ocean Analystics, LLC
jodonnell@coastaloa.com
860.961.2467
www.CoastalOA.com